Ahoy
by Bill Prater

Fiberglass Resin

1. Pocket Cruiser, by Stevenson Projects
2. Bellhaven, by B & B Yacht Designs
3. Allegra by Fred Bingham

Pocket Cruiser is light and small, easy to tow and store. That would be nice. Bellhaven takes the qualities of Pocket Cruiser, and adds a longer hull with an innovative centerboard/bilge keel design to permit sailing right off the trailer, as long as there is enough water that she’ll float. Allegra is an awesome boat, but a big project while still holding down a Real Job.

What always stops me in my tracks, though, is the cost/benefit analysis. I enjoy building a boat, but the cost of marine plywood, shipping to Colorado and epoxy leads to a big investment. The fun is diminished by the fear that I’ll only be able to get a small percentage of my money back when it comes time to move to the coast and buy or build a big boat. It comes down to a choice – do I do it right, and spend way too much money, do I buy a used Catalina with its good resale, or do I just bang some ACX together, slap some house paint on it, and get on the water?

That last idea sounds good, until I walk out and look at the Sharpie I built a few years ago. It sails great, and it is lots of fun. Unfortunately, it looks like hell – the plywood has “checking”. I don’t know if it would sell, but I know I wouldn’t buy a boat that was split. I sometimes wonder if I need to apologize to the world for inflicting an ugly boat upon it.

I’ve plowed this ground several times, as I mentioned. This time I noticed something different – Stevenson is saying to laminate the plywood with FIBERGLASS RESIN. They are crazy – don’t they know you can’t do that? It won’t stick! Didn’t they see those catamarans in the marinas back in the 70’s – the ones with big sheets of fiberglass falling off of them? Then I read a little more of the small print on their website – they have sold 1/3 million sets of plans. I don’t know how many sets of plans were sold for those ugly cement boats back in the 60’s and 70’s – but it was a lot less than 1/3 million before the word got out. If people are building the way they suggest, and are happy with the result … maybe this bears more investigation.

In my digging, I found a post by George Buehler on the subject. You may not know George, but George builds and designs BIG, STRONG boats. Like a seaplane hit one of his masts – the plane didn’t fare too well, but the boat was fine. He is a proponent of building something now, with what you can get your hands on, and getting on the water. On his site (georgebuehler.com), he quotes a man who worked on a project in 1958 where they fiberglassed (epoxy not available yet) a 40-foot wooden hull. That’s certainly a good-sized sample for a test. He saw the boat again in 1975, and it was holding up fine.

So, I was going to do some testing. Put some glass/epoxy and glass/resin samples together, maybe boil them. But, I don’t sail in boiling water very often – like never. I got to thinking – it has to be flexing that makes it come un-bonded. I should make long thin samples, so that I can test them in a flex mode, and see for myself how fiberglass bonds to wood.

Well, I was just getting ready to do that when I realized that it has already been done. Did I mention that I live in Colorado? I was describing skis! So I consulted the experts - K2. They make skis, as do a whole bunch of other people. They are long, thin strips of WOOD (for flexibility and shock absorption) wrapped in FIBERGLASS. If you’ve skied much, you know what a beating those things take. Every garage sale I go to has at least one pair of old skis. Beat up, banged around, broken – never seen a delaminated one. There it is on the K2 web site, as you see below.

So, I read some of Stevenson’s FAQ’s. There it is, the very question. They say it works. So I decided to write them, and asked “are you still getting good feedback from builders?” They replied that they are, and add that is important to thoroughly wet out the plywood before adding the glass, or absorption will make for a dry lay-up, and may not bond.

And I think that clue may be what brings us full circle – back to the marinas of the 60’s and 70’s. Back to where we saw big old catamarans built of plywood, with fiberglass falling off in sheets. What lesson could we draw from that – don’t use plywood in a lay-up with fiberglass resin? Or, could it be that poor craftsmanship, combined with a “build it cheap” project mentality (resin costs money) popular at that time doesn’t work with most materials, including fiberglass and ferro-cement?

Then there is the whole question of plywood-cored decks. There are a jillion of them out there, and they are still being built today. Some have delaminated, but most haven’t. The difference? What I read suggests that the ones that haven’t delaminated have been maintained – which means keeping the penetrations sealed so that water doesn’t get into the core. But, that is a whole different article.

My conclusion: I think it might be worthwhile to give it a try. I welcome the input of anyone who has EXPERIENCE with resin/fiberglass on plywood, good or bad.
Thanks, BP <bill.prater@lpl.com>